<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wasters Blog &#187; PFI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/pfi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wastersblog.com</link>
	<description>The Resource and Waste Management Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 03:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Institution of Civil Engineers UK Responds to the Budget by Asking for More Infrastructure Funding Arrangements</title>
		<link>http://wastersblog.com/441/institution-of-civil-engineers-uk-responds-to-the-budget-by-asking-for-more-infrastructure-funding-arrangements/</link>
		<comments>http://wastersblog.com/441/institution-of-civil-engineers-uk-responds-to-the-budget-by-asking-for-more-infrastructure-funding-arrangements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alistair darling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[double dip recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extra money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institution of civil engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[major projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppp projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wastersblog.com/?p=441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICE responded to the announcements in Alistair Darling&#8217;s budget on Wednesday welcoming many of the measures but with a number of caveats and additional calls. The ICE statement commented: &#8220;There is much to be welcomed in this budget. The commitment to maintaining capital investment to 2012 will hopefully reduce the danger of a double dip [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICE responded to the announcements in Alistair Darling&#8217;s budget on Wednesday welcoming many of the measures but with a number of caveats and additional calls.  The ICE statement commented:</p>
<p>&#8220;There is much to be welcomed in this budget. The commitment to maintaining capital investment to 2012 will hopefully reduce the danger of a double dip recession occurring in the engineering/construction industry.</p>
<p>&#8220;Long-term, the principle of putting green jobs at the centre of a new low carbon economy is a sound one. Therefore, the extra money for offshore wind and other renewable projects, incentives for CHP and carbon capture technologies, and the introduction of carbon budgets is to be welcomed.</p>
<p>&#8220;However we need to ensure that the UK has the infrastructure to enable us to properly exploit these emerging sectors. So, the real question left unanswered in today&#8217;s budget is how we are to fund essential infrastructure projects over the long term?</p>
<p>&#8220;Though expensive, these projects have a very high rate of return for the economy as a whole, which will be important as the UK recovers. With the difficulties PFI and PPP projects are encountering in securing funds, now &#8211; more than ever – is the time to consider alternative funding methods.</p>
<p>&#8220;One idea strongly advocated by ICE would be to explore the establishment of a National Infrastructure Bank. This could plug some of the gap created by the credit crunch allow the cost of major projects to be spread over their very long operational life.&#8221;</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/national-infrastructure/" title="national infrastructure" rel="tag">national infrastructure</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/capital-investment/" title="capital investment" rel="tag">capital investment</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/engineering-construction/" title="engineering construction" rel="tag">engineering construction</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/ppp-projects/" title="ppp projects" rel="tag">ppp projects</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/construction-industry/" title="construction industry" rel="tag">construction industry</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wastersblog.com/441/institution-of-civil-engineers-uk-responds-to-the-budget-by-asking-for-more-infrastructure-funding-arrangements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Badly Needed PFI Waste Projects Hit By Major Planning Problems</title>
		<link>http://wastersblog.com/430/pfi-waste-projects-hit-planning-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://wastersblog.com/430/pfi-waste-projects-hit-planning-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 12:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[energy from waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incineration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials recycling facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning permission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste processing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wastersblog.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two big Waste Processing Facilities have been halted after UK County Council plans have been derailed well into these projects. The question is asked when our society which produces so much waste will take responsibility for dealing with it in their local area, even when enormous sums are about to be spent on a new generation of vastly improved Waste Treatment Plants.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Despite previous reviews and setbacks which had all be overcome a planned Surrey Facility has been stopped, and the planned facility to serve Cornwall is now suffering the same fate. This is despite the fact that these new waste facilities are being introduced at huge cost as a new generation of low emissions facilities to divert waste from landfills, which are the landfills that the same locals will have already rejected. </p>
<p>Just when will our society realise that when everyone produces such large quantities of waste, the waste HAS to be processed and disposed of somehow, and somewhere, and that it is unreasonable to expect to send it out of the area in which the waste was created!</strong></p>
<p>In our first case the<strong> Surrey County Council</strong> <a href="http://waste-technology.co.uk/EfW/efw.php">Energy from Waste (EfW)</a> facility, which only received planning permission in October 2008, now looks set to face further delays after a successful challenge against its development by the local parish council. Surrey Waste Management&#8217;s proposal for the facility at the Clockhouse Brickworks site in Capel, Surrey, has suffered a myriad of set-backs and challenges since the original planning permission, granted as far back as 2002, was overturned. </p>
<p>An official judgment is expected to have been made by the end of February (after this issue has gone to press). The 100000 tonnes capacity facility was intended to be operational in 2012 as part of a PFI-funded deal between Sita subsidiary, Surrey Waste Management, and the county council.</p>
<p><strong>Our second problem waste processing facility in Cornwall has been rejected and new plans must be drawn up, so the problem is really serious for the citizens of Cornwall. The following is an extract from the BBC News item highlighting the problem:</strong></p>
<p><strong>New county waste plans &#8216;needed&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>An alternative strategy for dealing with Cornwall&#8217;s waste needs to be drawn up as soon as possible, a council scrutiny committee has ruled.</p>
<p>The call to Cornwall Council comes after plans by waste company Sita for an incinerator at St Dennis were refused two weeks ago.</p>
<p>Sita then withdrew proposals for a waste centre at Scorrier last week.</p>
<p>The council will decide whether to follow the recommendation for a waste plan after elections later in the year.</p>
<p>Cornwall Council&#8217;s Environment Policy and Development Scrutiny Committee recommended that a dedicated panel be set up to look at alternatives.</p>
<p>The committee&#8217;s chairman, independent councillor Mark Kaczmarek, said: &#8220;It is essential that Cornwall has a clear way forward to deal with its waste.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our remaining landfill is running out. Far too much time and money has been wasted over the last few years and no solution to Cornwall&#8217;s waste disposal has been created. Cornwall Council must make this issue a priority.&#8221;</p>
<p>The full council will decide whether to follow the recommendation for a waste plan after it holds its elections in June.</p>
<p>County councillors voted 20-to-one on 26 March against Sita&#8217;s bid to build a waste-to-energy incinerator in the county. Planning officials had advised the council to grant the application.</p>
<p>The £117m waste-to-energy plant would have handled all of Cornwall&#8217;s waste &#8211; an estimated 240,000 tonnes of waste a year which would, in turn, have generated power for thousands of homes across the county. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cornwall/7985409.stm" rel="nofollow">More here.</a></p>

	Tags: <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/uk/" title="UK" rel="tag">UK</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/landfill/" title="landfill" rel="tag">landfill</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/waste-processing/" title="waste processing" rel="tag">waste processing</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/planning-permission/" title="planning permission" rel="tag">planning permission</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/waste/" title="waste" rel="tag">waste</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wastersblog.com/430/pfi-waste-projects-hit-planning-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GMWDA and Cumbria Still to Announce PFI Deal as Financial Year Closes</title>
		<link>http://wastersblog.com/415/gmwda-pfi-deals-still-awaited/</link>
		<comments>http://wastersblog.com/415/gmwda-pfi-deals-still-awaited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[materials recycling facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit crunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GMWDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greater manchester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new civil engineer magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferred bidder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste disposal authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wastersblog.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Waster was hoping to hear that the Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority and Cumbria have completed their PFI deals, but time to achieve the goal of signing within the 2008/9 financial year is fast evaporating. Here is what the New Civil Engineer magazine was saying back in February: Manchester waste PFI deal to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Waster was hoping to hear that the Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority and Cumbria have completed their PFI deals, but time to achieve the goal of signing within the 2008/9 financial year is fast evaporating. <strong>Here is what the New Civil Engineer magazine was saying back in February:</strong></p>
<h2>Manchester waste PFI deal to be done by end of month</h2>
<p>Europe&#8217;s largest waste management contract, the £3.3bn Greater Manchester waste PFI, will be finalised by the end of the month, an insider on the project has claimed.</p>
<p>The source said the banks involved in the 25 year contract were close to agreeing the struc­ture of the finance.</p>
<p>A joint venture between infrastructure investor John Laing and waste contractor Viridor was originally named as preferred bidder by client Greater Manchester Waste Disposal Authority (GMWDA) in January 2007.</p>
<p>But the complexity of the deal and increasingly difficult lending conditions caused by the credit crisis have meant that every deadline for the project has so far been issed. Last December GMWDA predicted that the deal would be wrapped up by Christmas 2008 (NCE 4 December 2008).</p>
<blockquote><p>I think that many are waiting anxiously to see these signings go through. The industry needs this vital re-assurance that the banks are still able to put together a deal of this size, are lending, and that the credit crunch has done its worst&#8230; (The Waster)</p></blockquote>

	Tags: <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/credit-crunch/" title="credit crunch" rel="tag">credit crunch</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/waste-management/" title="waste management" rel="tag">waste management</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/pfi/" title="PFI" rel="tag">PFI</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/new-civil-engineer-magazine/" title="new civil engineer magazine" rel="tag">new civil engineer magazine</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/greater-manchester/" title="greater manchester" rel="tag">greater manchester</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wastersblog.com/415/gmwda-pfi-deals-still-awaited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Derby MSW Gasification Project &#8211; Energos Preferred Bidder to UU/Interserve</title>
		<link>http://wastersblog.com/401/energos-gasification/</link>
		<comments>http://wastersblog.com/401/energos-gasification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biowaste treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy from waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derby city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[derbyshire county council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENER-G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gasification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isle of wight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint venture project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal solid waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[municipal solid waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preferred bidder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sinfin Lane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste recycling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wastersblog.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Energos Appointed Preferred Bidder to Derby Gasification Project 26-01-2009 Gasification specialists Energos have been appointed to provide the technology for a multi-million pound waste treatment facility being built in Derby. The company, which is part of Manchester-based renewable energy firm ENER-G, will help to develop a 140,000 tonne-a-year gasification facility on Sinfin Lane in Derby [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Energos Appointed Preferred Bidder to Derby Gasification Project</strong></p>
<p>26-01-2009</p>
<p>Gasification specialists Energos have been appointed to provide the technology for a multi-million pound waste treatment facility being built in Derby.</p>
<p>The company, which is part of Manchester-based renewable energy firm ENER-G, will help to develop a 140,000 tonne-a-year gasification facility on Sinfin Lane in Derby on behalf of a joint venture between United Utilities and services firm Interserve.</p>
<p>An artist&#8217;s impression of the Sinfin Lane facility that will use Energos&#8217; gasification technology</p>
<p>United Utilities and Interserve were confirmed on January 13 as preferred bidder for a 27-year deal, beginning in 2010, to design, build and operate a facility to process both Derbyshire county council and Derby city council&#8217;s residual household waste.</p>
<p>Energos&#8217; appointment means the plant will use their patented version of the advanced thermal treatment process to convert the waste into a gas, which will then be used to produce 8MW of electricity for export to the National Grid.</p>
<p>Energos&#8217; process has already been installed in a plant on the Isle of Wight which opened last year (see letsrecycle.com story) and, in July 2008, the company submitted a planning proposal to build an 80,000 tonne-a-year capacity facility at Knowsley, on Merseyside (see letsrecycle.com story).</p>
<p>The Derby project&#8217;s joint venture project director, Blair Marriott, said: &#8220;We are pleased to be working with Energos which offers a world class, low emission technology and a proven reputation for excellence.</p>
<p>&#8220;Our proposed state-of-the-art waste management facility points the way forward for UK municipal solid waste management and is a viable and environmentally friendly alternative to landfill and incineration,&#8221; he added.</p>
<p>Energos&#8217; managing director, Nick Dawber, described the facility as &#8220;a community-sized solution to responsibly dealing with local waste.&#8221;</p>
<p>United Utilities and Interserve were announced as preferred bidder for the Derbyshire contract in December 2008, winning a lengthy head-to-head contest with Spanish-owned Waste Recycling Group (WRG) (see letsrecycle.com story).</p>
<p>The deal represents United Utilities first major contract success in the waste sector, though it is one of four shortlisted bidders for the Cheshire PFI contract (see letsrecycle.com story), and is also part of the consortium the &#8216;Resource from Waste Alliance&#8217; which is the running for the Merseyside PFI waste deal (see <a href="http://www.letsrecycle.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=37&#038;listcatid=217&#038;listitemid=10937" rel="nofollow">letsrecycle.com</a> story). </p>

	Tags: <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/waste-management/" title="waste management" rel="tag">waste management</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/pfi/" title="PFI" rel="tag">PFI</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/derby-city-council/" title="derby city council" rel="tag">derby city council</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/technology/" title="Technology" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/ener-g/" title="ENER-G" rel="tag">ENER-G</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wastersblog.com/401/energos-gasification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>391,000 Tonnes/yr of Landfill Waste Diverted in DEFRA PFI Deal</title>
		<link>http://wastersblog.com/266/391000-tonnesyr-of-landfill-waste-diverted-in-defra-pfi-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://wastersblog.com/266/391000-tonnesyr-of-landfill-waste-diverted-in-defra-pfi-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>waster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[landfill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodegradable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diverted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leicestershire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tonnes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wastersblog.com/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[£181.6m for project to save 391,000 tonnes of landfill waste Waste facilities in Leicestershire and the South West will see major improvements thanks to a combined £181.6 million in funding announced by Defra today. In Leicestershire, the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) project is expecting to divert 98,000 tonnes of Biodegradable Municipal Waste from landfill in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>£181.6m for project to save 391,000 tonnes of landfill waste</p>
<p>Waste facilities in Leicestershire and the South West will see major improvements thanks to a combined £181.6 million in funding announced by Defra today. </p>
<p>In Leicestershire, the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) project is expecting to divert 98,000 tonnes of Biodegradable Municipal Waste from landfill in 2020. In the South West the PFI project will divert 293,000 tonnes from landfill in 2020 &#8211; making an important contribution to the UK’s landfill directive targets. </p>
<p>Leicestershire plans to build on its already successful recycling and composting record. Not only does the county expect to reach the Government’s 2020  recycling target of 50 per cent 10 years early, but with further plans it aims to reach 58 per cent by 2017.  In the South West, 92 per cent of the biodegradable waste in the area will be diverted from landfill.</p>
<p>The schemes could also deliver estimated total net carbon savings of 53,260 tonnes in 2019/20, compared to the current situation.  The potential for combined heat and power (CHP) could increase this further to 121,500 tonnes of savings over both projects.</p>
<p>Waste Minister Joan Ruddock said: </p>
<p>“Reducing our reliance on landfill is an essential part of the drive to tackle climate change and I welcome the ambitious commitment made by Leicestershire and three authorities in the South West. </p>
<p>“PFI agreements like this create a real incentive for local authorities and industry to work together to cut waste and make better use of the waste we do create, as well as reducing our impact on the environment.”</p>

	Tags: <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/carbon/" title="carbon" rel="tag">carbon</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/heat/" title="heat" rel="tag">heat</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/defra/" title="Defra" rel="tag">Defra</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/leicestershire/" title="Leicestershire" rel="tag">Leicestershire</a>, <a href="http://wastersblog.com/tag/tonnes/" title="Tonnes" rel="tag">Tonnes</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wastersblog.com/266/391000-tonnesyr-of-landfill-waste-diverted-in-defra-pfi-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

