Pin It

Above header

2009 Was The Year Waste Became a Resource Optimisation Opportunity

United Kingdom Waste Management in 2009: The Year Waste Became a Resource
Optimisation Opportunity

The United Kingdom (UK) has traditionally used as the main method of waste management. However, it has long been recognised that is unsustainable due to its long term harmful effects on the environment and .

Landfill also places a high long term risk on , which could threaten the availability of clean water for .

Under the European Union (EU) , and starting in 2006, were required to divert biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) from . The UK has also committed to the EU , which binds it to sourcing at least 15% of its from by 2020.

Through the the emphasis was on , and this is still the case, but will only achieve up to a point. Therefore, to meet these targets, the UK is developing alternative waste as well as planning to achieve considerable deployment of renewables.

Throughout 2009 a number of aspects of UK that have been in place for some time came together so that for the first time a genuine shift in the industry could be detected. Investors began to see the wisdom of those that have already anticipated this and have committed to investment in the waste technologies, as many of the smaller more nimbly operators have begun to make profits. Where profit is to be made others will now follow to secure waste contracts for the resource that collected material provides them.

If asked what the single biggest influence on this was during 2009, I would say it as the government’s escalator policy which meant that for most , for the first time, landfill disposal actually became more expensive than recycling. You can argue around the detail here, but I had not before the summer of 2009 witnessed recycling companies able to say they could offer price competitive disposal prices when head to head with the traditional landfill operators.

Another major driving force in UK waste management which is powering the evolution from a disposal problem to a resource optimisation opportunity are the high targets for waste diversion from landfill, and 20 year or longer integrated waste management contracts. These are public/private partnership projects which the UK government is pushing ahead with now in order to achieve those targets.

Here to, we saw a major milestone achieved while the recession was biting the hardest early in 2009. This was the successful planning application, and award of contract, for the £4 billion Greater Manchester Waste PFI Contract, the largest of its kind in Europe, and all built upon stakeholder involvement. However, the Greater Manchester PFI Contract is only the most high profile example of a procurement revolution which probably reached its peak of activity during 2009, and saw similar contracts either largely in place or planned throughout the nation.

The year also saw a number of these projects hit the headlines, and some Energy from Waste schemes being pushed back at planning (Cornwall and Edinburgh for example).

However, the trend continued and accelerated so that for all waste streams and/or locations where re-use or recycling of waste is not viable, energy recovery is being reinforced as the preferred option, with disposal used only as a last resort.

For a long while the major Energy from Waste producer has been from landfills, and it has been landfill gas (LFG) utilisation. However, the relative importance to LFG utilisation as a proportion of total energy from waste production will now be expected to decline.

Each month in the years to come we will see the rollout of new energy from waste (EfW) projects coming on-stream. However, while the adoption of new waste technologies is being supported in the UK by government departments, the perceived high risk for the PFI partnerships, has remained high. 2009 was not good for implementing the more innovative of these.

The increased cautiousness of the banks funding the private element of these projects has come at a very unfortunate time, as it has in my view severely detracted against the bankability of schemes using these new technologies. In fact, 2009 saw the shelving of quite a number of the more adventurous new waste technology options in favour of more traditional incineration technology.

During the year events also reinforced the wisdom of encouraging the use of EfW and other home grown renewable energy source, within the global scene. Most will remember that early in 2009 we saw the deep rationing of natural gas supplies to some European nations which were themselves unconnected with a producer country dispute. This held up supplies during the coldest weather and in a completely arbitrary fashion.

Most now strongly support the benefits of renewable energy for its improved energy supply security, ability to provide climate change mitigation when combined with stiff recycling targets and the highest possible waste diversion, and not least its resource efficiency.

However, good though that may be for waste as an opportunity, the main event of the year was the new found security to the recyclers which came with the attainment of the economic tipping point, whereby landfilling has become more expensive than most forms of main stream recycling activity. From now on the markets in recyclates will operate on a progressively more stable and normal economic basis.

Recycling has always made sense for the environment, but from now on it will also become a natural economically favourable option as well We can also look forward to the future knowing that the landfill tax will rise again in April 2010, taking us further into the new UK era of waste as a resource of opportunity.

Related terms: Opportunity Resources Kalispell, Women's Opportunity Resource Center, Job Opportunities in Missoula Montana, Word Missoula Montana, Missoula Word, Women of Word, Columbia Opportunity Resource, Homes of Opportunity Inc

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

One Response to 2009 Was The Year Waste Became a Resource Optimisation Opportunity

  1. GIngram 11 February 2010 at 3:39 pm #

    This is a positive step taken by the UK and one which will need to be replicated on a much wider scale if the effects of landfill are to be reduced. Professor Ian Williams, Head of the Centre for Waste Management at the University of Central Lancashire has written an interesting article into the challenges and options of waste in the next decade (http://www.futureagenda.org/?cat=16); he points out that we have the “option of creating [a] new accredited global standards for management, treatment and disposal of waste, but this needs cooperation between companies and countries”, whether this cooperation happens is yet to be seen.

Leave a Reply